Link to This Page
| From:
|
Roman
on December 18, 2007 |
| Comment: |
Looks Great |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| From:
|
a2
on December 18, 2007 |
| Comment: |
i like the idea, but the artist screwed you, that is very poorly done....its fixable though, go somewhere else |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From:
|
MrKaraokeSteve
on December 19, 2007 |
| Comment: |
a2 - how did the artist screw me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From:
|
a2
on December 19, 2007 |
| Comment: |
well since you asked...the line work is shaky and basic, there is absolutely no attempt at shading here. the coloring is incomplete and messy. its supposed to look as if the skin was peeled back, and what is underneath is your AF logo. it doesnt look peeled back at all. he used one needle size for the whole thing. its done by a beginer, its very very obvious. he did basic outlining, and not very well, didnt attempt any type of shading, or do one thing to make it stand out.
your tattoo idea, was outstanding, it wasnt accomplished.
go to a better artist, there are literally hundreds of them in the mesa/phoenix area who could really hook that up for you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From:
|
MrKaraokeSteve
on December 19, 2007 |
| Comment: |
Well, just letting you know the skin is not being peeled back, its being "burnt" or "eroded" away.. Just to let you know this is not a beginner, he has been tattooing for every..
And just for the record, I love this design, and it came out exactly like I drew it. I asked him to tattoo is as I drew it.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From:
|
a2
on December 19, 2007 |
| Comment: |
wow, well it doesnt look burned or eroded either. sorry thats an average tattoo, that could be so much better |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From:
|
bb
on January 19, 2008 |
| Comment: |
Sorry but I agree with a2. The idea is good but the tat itself is sub par. Go somewhere else and have them fix it, whether you like it or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abusive comments will not be tolerated. Excessive misuse will result in account termination.
|
|
FAQs |
Login
